loading page

Molecular basis for higher affinity of SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD for human ACE2 receptor
  • +3
  • Julian Delgado,
  • Nalvi Duro,
  • David Rogers,
  • Alexandre Tkatchenko,
  • Sagar Pandit,
  • Sameer Varma
Julian Delgado
University of South Florida

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Nalvi Duro
University of South Florida
Author Profile
David Rogers
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Author Profile
Alexandre Tkatchenko
University of Luxembourg
Author Profile
Sagar Pandit
University of South Florida
Author Profile
Sameer Varma
University of South Florida
Author Profile


Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused substantially more infections, deaths, and economic disruptions than the 2002-2003 SARS-CoV. The key to understanding SARS-CoV-2’s higher infectivity lies partly in its host receptor recognition mechanism. Experiments show that the human ACE2 protein, which serves as the primary receptor for both CoVs, binds to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of CoV-2’s spike protein stronger than SARS-CoV’s spike RBD. The molecular basis for this difference in binding affinity, however, remains unexplained from X-ray structures. To go beyond insights gained from X-ray structures and investigate the role of thermal fluctuations in structure, we employ all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Microseconds-long simulations reveal that while CoV and CoV-2 spike-ACE2 interfaces have similar conformational binding modes, CoV-2 spike interacts with ACE2 via a larger combinatorics of polar contacts, and on average, makes 45\% more polar contacts. Correlation analysis and thermodynamic calculations indicate that these differences in the density and dynamics of polar contacts arise from differences in spatial arrangements of interfacial residues, and dynamical coupling between interfacial and non-interfacial residues. These results recommend that ongoing efforts to design spike-ACE2 peptide blockers will benefit from incorporating dynamical information as well as allosteric coupling effects.
15 Feb 2021Submitted to PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
22 Feb 2021Submission Checks Completed
22 Feb 2021Assigned to Editor
23 Feb 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
19 Mar 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
20 Mar 2021Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
31 Mar 20211st Revision Received
01 Apr 2021Submission Checks Completed
01 Apr 2021Assigned to Editor
01 Apr 2021Reviewer(s) Assigned
01 Apr 2021Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
02 Apr 2021Editorial Decision: Accept