• In general, was the manuscript easy to follow/did it have a logical flow? Were there a lot of typos that needed addressing?
  • Does the abstract provide a concise summary of the hypotheses and main results?
  • Were the methods sufficiently detailed to allow the experiments to be repeated?
  • Were the figures clear and logically arranged? Were the figure legends sufficiently detailed to allow the figures to be understood without reading the main text?
  • Are the figures representative of the data described in the results section?
  • Did the authors make all their associated data openly available (e.g. sequencing data, coding)?
  • Did the discussion address how their results move the field forwards?
  • Were the citations thorough or were key references missing?