In general, was the manuscript easy to follow/did it have a logical flow? Were there a lot of typos that needed addressing?
Does the abstract provide a concise summary of the hypotheses and main results?
Were the methods sufficiently detailed to allow the experiments to be repeated?
Were the figures clear and logically arranged? Were the figure legends sufficiently detailed to allow the figures to be understood without reading the main text?
Are the figures representative of the data described in the results section?
Did the authors make all their associated data openly available (e.g. sequencing data, coding)?
Did the discussion address how their results move the field forwards?
Were the citations thorough or were key references missing?