References
1. Boog G. Asphyxie périnatale et infirmité motrice d’origine cérébrale (I- Le diagnostic). Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil. 2010. 1–38 p.
2. Everett TR, Peebles DM. Antenatal tests of fetal wellbeing. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. juin 2015;20(3):138‑43.
3. Carbonne B ME Pons K. Foetal scalp blood sampling during labour for pH and lactate measurements. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. Vol. 30. 2016. 62–7 p.
4. Belfort MA S. GR. ST segment analysis as an adjunct to electronic fetal monitoring, Part I: background, physiology, and interpretation. Clin Perinatol. 1(143–157).
5. Ugwumadu A. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. août 2014;121(9):1063‑70.
6. 15. Pinas A CE. Continuous cardiotocography during labour: Analysis, classification and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. Vol. 30. 2016. 33–47 p.
7. Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: Cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet Off Organ Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. oct 2015;131(1):13‑24.
8. Belfort MA, Saade GR, Thom E, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Thorp JM, et al. A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis. N Engl J Med. 13 août 2015;373(7):632‑41.
9. Chandraharan E. Fetal scalp blood sampling should be abandoned: FOR: FBS does not fulfil the principle of first do no harm. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016:123–11.
10. Classification CNGOF du rythme cardiaque fœtal : obstétriciens et sages-femmes au tableau ! J Gynécologie Obstétrique Biol Reprod. 2013:42–6.
11. Ayres-de-Campos D, Arteiro D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J. Knowledge of adverse neonatal outcome alters clinicians’ interpretation of the intrapartum cardiotocograph. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. juill 2011;118(8):978‑84.
12. Garabedian 3. C, De Jonckheere J, Butruille L, Deruelle P, Storme L, Houfflin-Debarge V. Understanding fetal physiology and second line monitoring during labor. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017:46–2.
13. Chandraharan E. Handbook of CTG Interpretation: From Patterns to Physiology. 1re éd. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 256 p.
14. Ghesquière L, De Jonckheere J, Drumez E, Sharma D, Aubry E, Deruelle P, et al. Parasympathetic nervous system response to acidosis: Evaluation in an experimental fetal sheep model. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. avr 2019;98(4):433‑9.
15. Garabedian C, Champion C, Servan-Schreiber E, Butruille L, Aubry E, Sharma D, et al. A new analysis of heart rate variability in the assessment of fetal parasympathetic activity: An experimental study in a fetal sheep model. PloS One. 2017;12(7):e0180653.
16. Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang M. Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(2):CD000063.
17. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM, Cuthbert A. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 03 2017;2:CD006066.
18. Jonsson M, Nordén-Lindeberg S, Ostlund I, Hanson U. Metabolic acidosis at birth and suboptimal care–illustration of the gap between knowledge and clinical practice. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. oct 2009;116(11):1453‑60.
19. Clinical negligence scheme for trusts. Clinical risk management standards for maternity services. London: NHS litigation Authority 2002.
20. Berglund S, Pettersson H, Cnattingius S, Grunewald C. How often is a low Apgar score the result of substandard care during labour? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1 juill 2010;117(8):968‑78.
21. Jonsson M, Nordén SL, Hanson U. Analysis of malpractice claims with a focus on oxytocin use in labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(3):315‑9.
22. Nocon JJ, Coolman DA. Perinatal malpractice. Risks and prevention. J Reprod Med. févr 1987;32(2):83‑90.
23. Draycott T, Sibanda T, Owen L, Akande V, Winter C, Reading S, et al. Does training in obstetric emergencies improve neonatal outcome? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. févr 2006;113(2):177‑82.
24. Thellesen L, Bergholt T, Sorensen JL, Rosthoej S, Hvidman L, Eskenazi B, et al. The impact of a national cardiotocography education program on neonatal and maternal outcomes: A historical cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 29 mai 2019;
25. Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(5):421‑4.
26. Beaulieu MD, Fabia J, Leduc B, Brisson J, Bastide A, Blouin D, et al. The reproducibility of intrapartum cardiotocogram assessments. Can Med Assoc J. 1 août 1982;127(3):214‑6.
27. Palomäki O, Luukkaala T, Luoto R, Tuimala R. Intrapartum cardiotocography – the dilemma of interpretational variation. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(4):298‑302.
28. Westerhuis MEMH, van Horen E, Kwee A, van der Tweel I, Visser GHA, Moons KGM. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. mars 2009;116(4):545‑51.
29. Pehrson C, Sorensen JL, Amer-Wåhlin I. Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. juill 2011;118(8):926‑35.
30. Morel O, Richard F, Thiébaugeorges O, Malartic C, Clément D, Akerman G, et al. [Fetal scalp pH: practical value during labour]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. nov 2007;35(11):1148‑54.
31. Stener Jørgensen. Fetal scalp blood sampling should be abandoned: AGAINST: Fetal scalp blood sampling in conjunction with electronic fetal monitoring reduces the risk of unnecessary operative delivery. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016:123–11.
32. Reif P, Schott S, Boyon C, Richter J, Kavšek G, Timoh KN, et al. Does knowledge of fetal outcome influence the interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocography and subsequent clinical management? A multicentre European study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(13):2208‑17.