References
1. Hurley ET, O’Sullivan KE, Segurado R, Hurley JP. A Meta-Analysis
Examining Differences in Short-Term Outcomes between Sutureless and
Conventional Aortic Valve Prostheses. Innovations (Phila). 2015 Nov
1;10(6):375–82.
2. MD FP, MD GS, MD AMD, MD LG, MD HA, MD FV, et al. Better Short-Term
Outcome by Using Sutureless Valves: A Propensity-Matched Score Analysis.
ATS. Elsevier Inc; 2014 Aug 1;98(2):611–7.
3. Dalén M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, Santarpino G, Glaser N, De Praetere
H, et al. Aortic valve replacement through full sternotomy with a
stented bioprosthesis versus minimally invasive sternotomy with a
sutureless bioprosthesis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
2015 Dec 15;49(1):220–7.
4. Laborde F, Fischlein T, Hakim-Meibodi K, Misfeld M, Carrel T, Zembala
M, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in 658 patients receiving
the Perceval sutureless aortic valve: early results from a prospective
European multicentre study (the Cavalier Trial)†. Eur J Cardiothorac
Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):978–86.
5. Santarpino G, Berretta P, Kappert U, Teoh K, Mignosa C, Meuris B, et
al. Minimally Invasive Redo Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From a
Multicentric Registry (SURD-IR). The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2020
Jan 16.
6. Beckmann E, Martens A, Alhadi F, Hoeffler K, Umminger J, Kaufeld T,
et al. Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than
root enlargement to avoid patient–prosthesis mismatch? Interactive
CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2016 May 26;22(6):744–9.