References:
1. Torregrossa G, Sa MP, Eynde JV den, Malin J, Sicouri S, Wertan M, et
al. Hybrid Robotic Off-pump Versus Conventional On-Pump and Off-Pump
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Women. J Card Surg.
2. Wang C, Li P, Zhang F, Li J, Kong Q. Is hybrid coronary
revascularization really beneficial in the long term? Eur J Cardiothorac
Surg. 2021 Nov 2;60(5):1158–66.
3. Sardar P, Kundu A, Bischoff M, Chatterjee S, Owan T, Nairooz R, et
al. Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass
grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A
meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 1;91(2):203–12.
4. Nolan S, Filion KB, Atallah R, Moss E, Reynier P, Eisenberg MJ.
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization vs Complete Coronary Artery Bypass
Grafting for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review
and Meta-Analysis. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Dec;30(12):E131–49.
5. Harskamp RE, Bagai A, Halkos ME, Rao SV, Bachinsky WB, Patel MR, et
al. Clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization versus
coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of 1,190 patients. Am
Heart J. 2014 Apr;167(4):585–92.
6. Guan Z, Zhang Z, Gu K, Wang H, Lin J, Zhou W, et al. Minimally
Invasive CABG or Hybrid Coronary Revascularization for Multivessel
Coronary Diseases: Which Is Best? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.
Heart Surg Forum. 2019 Dec 20;22(6):E493–502.
7. Hu S, Li Q, Gao P, Xiong H, Zheng Z, Li L, et al. Simultaneous hybrid
revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass for multivessel
coronary artery disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Feb;91(2):432–8.
8. Bachinsky WB, Abdelsalam M, Boga G, Kiljanek L, Mumtaz M, McCarty C.
Comparative study of same sitting hybrid coronary artery
revascularization versus off-pump coronary artery bypass in multivessel
coronary artery disease. J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Oct;25(5):460–8.
9. Kon ZN, Brown EN, Tran R, Joshi A, Reicher B, Grant MC, et al.
Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization reduces postoperative
morbidity compared with results from conventional off-pump coronary
artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Feb;135(2):367–75.
10. Reicher B, Poston RS, Mehra MR, Joshi A, Odonkor P, Kon Z, et al.
Simultaneous “hybrid” percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally
invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical
outcomes. Am Heart J. 2008 Apr;155(4):661–7.
11. Halkos ME, Ford L, Peterson D, Bluestein SM, Liberman HA, Kilgo P,
et al. The impact of hybrid coronary revascularization on hospital costs
and reimbursements. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 May;97(5):1610–5; discussion
1615-1616.
12. Hage A, Giambruno V, Jones P, Chu MW, Fox S, Teefy P, et al. Hybrid
Coronary Revascularization Versus Off‐Pump Coronary Artery Bypass
Grafting: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis With Long‐Term Follow‐up.
Journal of the American Heart Association. 2019 Dec 1;8(24):e014204.
13. Tajstra M, Hrapkowicz T, Hawranek M, Filipiak K, Gierlotka M,
Zembala M, et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization in Selected Patients
With Multivessel Disease: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the
Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May
14;11(9):847–52.
14. Gąsior M, Zembala MO, Tajstra M, Filipiak K, Gierlotka M, Hrapkowicz
T, et al. Hybrid Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Artery
Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 Nov 1;7(11):1277–83.
15. Ganyukov VI, Kochergin NA, Shilov AA, Tarasov RS, Skupien J, Kozyrin
KA, et al. Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical Versus Percutaneous
Versus Hybrid Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 3 Years’
Follow-Up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 24;14(10):1163–5.