Patient follow-up
Complete follow-up data were available for hospital survivors. The mean
follow-up period was 83 ± 44 months (median, 98 months). The follow-up
rate was 100%.
Statistical analyses: Quantitative data are expressed as mean ±
standard deviation (SD). Statistical comparisons between the two groups
were performed using an unpaired Student’s t test or the Fisher’s exact
test and a log-rank test using the JMP 14 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC,
USA). P values of <0.05 were considered statistically
significant. Significance was determined when p<0.05. The
reference value range of the maximal CT value for simple anastomosis
application was determined by the area under the receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve. Results of quantitative studies are
presented as mean ± SD. Survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier
method. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to
exclude the confounding factors and identify independent risk factors
for long-term survival.
Results: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups are
presented in Table 1 . The number of female, smoker and
arteriosclerosis were significantly higher in the Manipulation group
(p<0.05). The Hemoglobin and eGFR were significantly higher,
and the body weight was significantly heavier in the Simple group
(p<0.05). One patient in the Simple group was a dialysis
patient. Table 2 shows the replacement range of the aorta in
each group. Aortic arch replacement was most common in the Simple group
(50.5%), while ascending and descending aorta replacement accounted for
the majority in the Manipulation group (52.9% and 17.6%,
respectively). The JapanSCORE has been devised as the Japanese original
risk model for cardiovascular surgery2. JapanSCORE was
similar between the two groups. The replacement range of the aorta was
wider in the Simple group rather than in the Manipulation group
(p<0.01). The concomintant procedure was not significantly
different between the two groups. Perioperative data are summarized inTable 3 . Operation time and cardiopulmonary bypass time were
shorter in the Manipulation group. Hospital death rate was 1.9% (2/105)
in the Simple group and 5.9% (1/17) in the Manipulation group.
Postoperative bleeding and cerebral infarction were occurred in each
group. These complications were not related to the anastomosis site.
There were no significant difference in postoperative stay, intensive
care unit stay, and the amount of bleeding.
The distribution of maximal CT value is shown in Figure 1 . The
mean maximal CT value (Hounsfield unit: HU) was 94.7 ± 171.5 (0-790) in
the Simple group, and 638.1 ± 269.5(166-1304) in the Manipulation group.
The maximal CT value was significantly higher in the Manipulation group
than that in the Simple group. The ROC curve revealed that the best
cut-off value for the prediction of manipulation was 325 HU (sensitivity
94.1%, specificity 81.7%) (Figure 2 ). The area under the
curve was calculated to be 0.96 (p<0.0001).
The postoperative 10-year actual survival rates of the patients are
shown in Figure 3 . The 5-year and 10-year survival rate were
69.7% and 38.3% in all patients (Figure 3A ). The 5-year and
10-year survival rate were 73.3% and 43.2% in the Simple group and
47.6% and 11.2% in the Manipulation group (Figure 3B ). The
postoperative survival rate in the Manipulation group was significantly
lower than those in the Simple group (p = 0.001). The variables that had
p values < 0.10 according to the univariate Cox analyses of
age, hypertension, preoperative eGFR, required amount of blood
transfusion, preoperative hemoglobin, Japan SCORE, Manipulation, body
wight, and maximal CT value. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard
analysis determined that age (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.073),
hypertension (HR: 2.38) and maximal CT (HR: 1.001) were independently
associated with long-term mortality.
Comment: Severe calcified lesion of the aorta increases the
risk of complications after cardiovascular surgery3.
Generally, if calcification interferes with anastomosis, it requires
root replacement4 or a larger extent of aortic
replacement beyond the planned anastomosis site, which also increases
the operative risk. If possible, the extended range of aortic
replacement should be reduced by manipulation of the calcified lesion of
the aorta. Recently, several papers have reported novel manipulation
methods of a calcified aorta, such as endarterectomy5and covering with bovine pericardium6. If preoperative
assessment are able to identify to be needed manipulation of the aorta,
well-planned strategies can be established before surgery.
CT is an ideal tool for diagnosis of calcified lesions. It is minimally
invasive and can be performed on almost all patients without a history
of claustrophobia. In Japan, CT scans are a common preoperative
examination for cardiovascular surgery. CT can detect various vascular
abnormalities including calcification and anomalies of aorta. Indeed,
Lee and colleagues7 suggested that preoperative CT may
help in identifying and avoiding aortic areas known to form emboli and
cause a stroke after cardiac operation8. In this
study, we evaluated whether the maximal CT value could predict the
application of simple anastomosis or reqirement of aortic manipulation
in patients with thoracic aortic disease. CT values range from -1000 to
1000 HU, depending on the density; air is -1000 HU, water is 0 HU and
bone is 1000 HU. The higher the CT value is the more calcified the
aorta. We found that a calcified aorta with a maximal CT value of 325 HU
or more requires manipulation prior to anastomosis. Therefore, if the
maximal CT value of the planned anastomosis site is 325 HU or more, a
manipulation method or another anastomosis site should be planned before
the operation.
In this study, endarterectomy was used for the manipulation of all
severely calcified aortas. We were concerned that endarterectomy may
increase the risk of aortic dissection, but no such incident was
observed. Svensson and colleagues5 reported that the
intima and media are densely adherent to the adventitia in patients with
a calcified aortic wall. If the media was prone to peel at a site distal
to the anastomosis, we hypothesized that aortic dissection was prevented
by fixing sutures using 5-0 monofilament. The anastomosis site was
reinforced by a continuous suture by the 4-0 monofilament suture and a
circumferential horizontal matteress suture with 4-0 monofilament
sutures with double pledgets. The clinical results were evaluated again
one year after the surgery and CT showed no dissection or pseudoaneurysm
in any of the patients. Furthermore, the total number of 30-day
operative deaths and cerebral infarction amounted to three and one
respectively. We concluded that the operative results were satisfactory,
even for patients with a severely calcified aorta.
We showed strong evidence that age, hypertension, and maximal CT value
are independently associated with long-term mortality. The follow up
rate is 100%, and this result is from 10 years actual survival. In
generally, age and hypertension are related to long-term mortality, so
the results of this study provide the first evidence that maximal CT
value may be a useful tool for the increase in late mortality.
Furthermore, though Agatston and colleagues9 reported
that CT protocol and coronary calcification score were determined by 20
slices from 3-mm slice CT images. And AZE Virtual Place Raijin, a
workstation of medical imaging, played an important role in this study.
Calcium scoring is one of the analysis options of the software. This
software automatically calculates voxel, volume, minimal CT value,
maximal CT value, average CT value, standard deviation, and Agatston
score from selection of CT images. We used “maximal CT value” in this
study as it was necessary to evaluate the calcification at the
anastomosis site. The software was originally set to calculate calcium
scoring (Agatston score) of coronary arteries from 3-mm slice CT images,
but we changed the setting to 5-mm slices, because this is the normal
width under CT imaging. The maximal CT value may not be included at
anastomosis site. However, it should be noted that the maximal CT value
does not change depending on the slice width and scanner. Furtehrmore,
we need only 2 slices CT image at proximal and distal anastomosis site.
And either 3 mm or 10 mm CT image is acceptable. In the future, we hope
that the maximal CT value becomes one of the standard preoperative
assessments to decide the operation plan for thoracic aortic surgery. In
conclusion, preoperative evaluation of the maximal CT value can help us
to predict whether simple anastomosis is applicable to patients with
thoracic aortic disease.
Conclusions : Preoperative evaluation of the maximal CT value is
a useful tool in predicting whether simple anastomosis is applicable or
not, in the thoracic aortic surgery. If the maximal CT value is 325 HU
or more, a manipulation method or another anastomosis site should be
planned before the operation. Furthermore, maximal CT value is
individual’s risk associated with late mortality. Further study is
needed to clarify the mechanisms that long-term mortality increases by
the CT value.
Author contributions :
Ryo Suzuki : Concept/design, Data analysis/interpretation,
Drafting article, Statistics, Data collection
Akihito Mikamo : Concept/design, Data analysis/interpretation,
Critical revision of article
Tsubone Sari, Kazumasa Matsunaga, Matsuno Yuutaro, Hiroshi
Kurazumi : Data collection
Kimikazu Hamano : Critical revision of article, Approval of
article