References
  1. Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, et al. Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and Thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol . 2008;1(5):354-362. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.108.803650
  2. Hoffmayer KS, Gerstenfeld EP. Contact force-sensing catheters:Current Opinion in Cardiology . 2015;30(1):74-80. doi:10.1097/HCO.0000000000000131
  3. Dalal AS, Nguyen HH, Bowman T, Van Hare GF, Avari Silva JN. Force‐Sensing Catheters During Pediatric Radiofrequency Ablation: The FEDERATION Study. JAHA . 2017;6(5). doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.005772
  4. Jarman JWE, Panikker S, Das M, et al. Relationship Between Contact Force Sensing Technology and Medium-Term Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Multicenter Study of 600 Patients: Contact Force Sensing AF Ablation Outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol . 2015;26(4):378-384. doi:10.1111/jce.12606
  5. Afzal MR, Chatta J, Samanta A, et al. Use of contact force sensing technology during radiofrequency ablation reduces recurrence of atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm . 2015;12(9):1990-1996. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.026
  6. Conti S, Weerasooriya R, Novak P, et al. Contact force sensing for ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A randomized, multicenter trial. Heart Rhythm . 2018;15(2):201-208. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.010
  7. Kimura M, Sasaki S, Owada S, et al. Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: A prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm . 2014;11(6):984-991. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.03.019
  8. Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm . 2012;9(11):1789-1795. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.016
  9. Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Is Contingent on Contact Force During Initial Treatment: Results From the EFFICAS I Study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol . 2013;6(2):327-333. doi:10.1161/CIRCEP.113.000374
  10. Olsson A, Darpo B, Bergfeldt L, Rosenqvist M. Frequency and long term follow up of valvar insufficiency caused by retrograde aortic radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Heart . 1999;81(3):292-296. doi:10.1136/hrt.81.3.292
  11. Mansour M, Lakkireddy D, Packer D, et al. Safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using fiber optic–based contact force sensing.Heart Rhythm . 2017;14(11):1631-1636. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.023
  12. Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D, et al. Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: recurrence at 1 year after initially successful ablation of supraventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm . 2004;1(2):188-196. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.03.067
  13. Gist K, Tigges C, Smith G, Clark J. Learning Curve for Zero-Fluoroscopy Catheter Ablation of AVNRT: Early versus Late Experience: AVNRT ABLATION WITHOUT FLUOROSCOPY. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology . 2011;34(3):264-268. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02952.x