Legacy of FEF science on governmental policies
Research at FEF has improved forest management policies in eastern US
deciduous forests, including regional best management practices (BMPs),
such as minimizing road construction impacts on erosion and
sedimentation (Kochenderfer, 1970) and protocols to test the efficacy of
the BMPs (Ryder & Edwards, 2005). It has also documented the effects of
regional air pollution on forests and the effectiveness of Federal
policies to reduce its impacts. There is no doubt that continuing
monitoring and long-term experiments in the FEF is crucial for the
ongoing improvement of policies aimed at maintaining a resilient
ecosystem.
Available Data:
Core datasets of the FEF include long-term hydro-climatological data for
five gauged watersheds, with measurements starting in 1951. Five
watersheds were added later. Daily time series of air temperature,
precipitation, streamflow, and biweekly precipitation and stream
chemistry data are publicly available from the Forest Service
[https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/ef/locations/wv/fernow/data/]. Data
are quality-controlled and curated by the FEF data manager. Growing
season (June – October) soil moisture measurements for surface (0-5 cm)
mineral soils in WS 3, 4, and 7 are available for 2007-2019
[http://www.as.wvu.edu/fernow/data.html]. Also available are
almost three decades (1964 – 1991) of pan evapotranspiration data
sampled daily during the growing season (April to September/October).
FEF is a member of several national environmental monitoring networks:
Climate and Hydrology Database Projects (CLIMDB/HYDRODB)
[https://climhy.lternet.edu/] focused on long-term
meteorological and streamflow records; Smart Forest
[http://smartforests-data.sr.unh.edu/data/gce/Fernow/data/] a
network of digital, high frequency and real-time environmental data; and
the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP)
[http://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/data/sites/siteDetails.aspx?net=NTN&id=WV18]
and Clean Air Status and Trends Networks (CASTNET)
[https://www3.epa.gov/castnet/site_pages/PAR207.html] which
provide some of the longest records of wet and dry deposition in the
U.S., respectively. For 15 years, research at the FEF has been supported
by the NSF LTREB (Long Term Research in Environmental Biology) program,
which has resulted in important data contributions on the
whole-watershed acidification and Long-Term Soil Productivity
experiments [http://www.as.wvu.edu/fernow/data.html].
Associated metadata can be found in the aforementioned references and
websites. Finally, data from short-duration studies at the FEF are also
available including sapflow in WS4 (growing seasons 2017 and 2018), and
a growing database of hyperspectral and hyper-spatial resolution remote
sensing datasets (e.g. Fang et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2015).
Future Directions
Advancing forest ecosystem management is a major challenge for this
century and an imperative for the future sustainability of forest and
water resources (Ellison et al., 2017). Moreover, current and future
environmental and societal challenges (e.g. climate change; novel
diseases; population growth; megadisturbances; and environmental
justice) require open data science approaches and higher levels of
collaboration. Forested uplands have long been relied upon as sources of
clean water, while at the same time suffering from resource extraction
and environmental pollution. Therefore, FEF encourages future research
and collaboration that propels science-based information to protect
water flow regimes and water quality, while maintaining other important
ecosystem and economic services like timber production and recreation.
Future research avenues may include: i) Linking hydrology and nutrient
cycling within a catchment - Ecohydrological coupling and separation
(i.e. testing the “two-water worlds” hypothesis (Berry et al., 2018)
and its implications for water quality); ii) Studying water balance
dynamics over time, focusing on storage (soil moisture) and
evapotranspiration (sapflow and interception); iii) Linking documented
changes in forest composition to present and future susceptibility to
drought/climate change (building on Young et al. 2019); iv)
Understanding recovery from ecosystem acidification (following cessation
of fertilizer additions to WS 3 in 2021); and v) Use of long-term
records and Empirical Dynamic Modeling (Sugihara et al., 2012) to
explore the causal influence of environmental change and vegetation
productivity (using tree-ring records) on hydrology and ecosystem
structure (e.g. Watson, 2018). Building on the substantial outcomes of
past research that shaped hydrologic management (Vose et al., 2012) and
silvicultural practices (Barrett, 1995) of the Appalachian Mountain
region, a strategic plan for future research will provide the critically
needed knowledge on the interactions between climate, streamflow, and
forest management practices that will usher in a new era of forest
ecosystem management in Appalachia and beyond.