There is no reason not to begin by introducing something innovative in order to bring in the meaning of innovation. Take, as an example, the heading just above. It is a very modest innovation, but also very simple and therefore prone to serve, with all due care, as introduction to this paragraph. After being decomposed, both "inno-vation" and "intro-duction" formed the word "innoduction." This could have been the first time ever that the word "innoduction" appeared. It certainly was not, yet it was instrumental in providing a rough representation of what is conventionally meant by innovation: breaking new ground. However, Eekels \cite{eekels_fundamentals_2000,eekels_fundamentals_2001} and others, such as Chakrabarti and Roozenburg \cite{2002}, had already employed the word "innoduction," and did so in a far more significant way than that found above (see below).
In dealing with innovation, naming it and hoping for it to be clear and distinct as to what is being referred to will not suffice. Acknowledging the light definition in the subparagraph above may on its own assist any researcher in discerning that whatever pre-set arrangements she/he comes across along her/his career are not holy or unchangeable, but rather potential sources of input that could be developed or exploited in more or less intelligent, innovative or even profitable ways.