How could it be better for researchers to grasp what innovation is than showing researchers the logical and precise way in which innovation is generated? As a result of such an understanding, scientists would acquire, at a derisory cost—i.e., by merely recognizing the logical possibility of breaking new ground or bringing about new arrangements—, a huge benefit, namely that of managing to critically examine their activities, along with their respective methods and material resources, thereby finding renewed avenues to engage in their R&D areas, as well as to perform with a view to achieving innovative results. But is there a logical formula to innovate?