Figure legends
Figure 1 Correlation of Mantel test between geographic distance and F ST. A, Mantel test from 43 populations of P. villosa ; B, Mantel test from populations of Group 1; C, Mantel test from populations of Group 2
Figure 2 Dendrogram of P. villosa generated by unweighted pair group method analysis (UPGMA) cluster analysis from the genetic similarity matrix obtained using amplified fragment length polymorphism genetic distance (see Figure S1 for population codes)
Figure 3 Neighbor‐Net split network of P. villosa based on amplified fragment length polymorphism dataset using Jaccard’s distances. Lines of red and yellow represent Group 1 and Group 2, respectively
Figure 4 A two‐dimensional plot of the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) based on variation of amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for P. villosa (see Figure S1 for population codes)
Figure 5 Results of the Bayesian clustering analysis in STRUCTURE of 210 individuals representing P. villosa. A,K values from the mean log‐likelihood probabilities through STRUCTURE runs where inferred cluster (K ) ranged from one to ten;B, Estimated genetic clustering for K = 2, where unique colors correspond to assignment at different clusters; C,Geographic origin from 43 populations of P. villosa and their color-coded grouping according to the structure analysis for the model with K = 2
Figure 6 Potentially suitable climatic distribution of P. villosa under different climate change scenarios in China
Figure 7 Present suitable climatic distribution of P. villosa in China
Figure 8 Spatial shifts for P. villosa under climate change scenarios
Figure 9 Results of the niche-identity test. A,Schoener’s D ; B, Warren’s I . The arrow in each panel represents the observed niche similarity between occurrence points for the corresponding pair of clusters. The histograms represent the distribution of niche similarities obtained from pairs of pseudo niches constructed by random resampling of occurrence points of the two clusters
Figure S1 Localities of Group 1 (red), Group 2 (yellow) sampled of P. villosa in the present study
Figure S2 Fluorescently‐labeled AFLPs generated using different primer combinations. A, E ‐AAC/M ‐CAA; B,E ‐AAG/M ‐CAC; C, E ‐ACA/M ‐CAG; D,E ‐ACT/M ‐CAT; E, E ‐ACC/M ‐CTA; F,E ‐ACG/M ‐CTC; G, E ‐AGC/M ‐CTG;H, E ‐AGG/M ‐CTT
Figure S3 The mean AUC of the test samples of P. villosa based on the MaxEnt model