Results are shown by Number (percentage). Percentages of satisfactory
and unsatisfactory results were calculated using the total number ears
with this risk factor as the denominator. Percentages of total number of
ears presenting the risk factor were calculated regarding the total
number of ears analysed at 1-year follow-up (n=139). Statistically
significant results are in bold. † all cranio-facial
anomalies including velopalatal clefts. ‡
tympanoplasty for perforation, retraction pocket or cholesteatoma.
§ perforation size greater than half the tympanic
membrane. ¤ inflammation of the ipsilateral tympanic
cavity during surgery including inflammation of the mucosa and/or glue
ear. ¶ Comparison of continuous values, shown as
median [Q1;Q3], using Student t-test. * Data analysed with Fisher’s
exact test (other values were analysed with Pearson’s Chi-squared test). |
Results are shown by Number (percentage). Percentages of satisfactory
and unsatisfactory results were calculated using the total number ears
with this risk factor as the denominator. Percentages of total number of
ears presenting the risk factor were calculated regarding the total
number of ears analysed at 1-year follow-up (n=139). Statistically
significant results are in bold. † all cranio-facial
anomalies including velopalatal clefts. ‡
tympanoplasty for perforation, retraction pocket or cholesteatoma.
§ perforation size greater than half the tympanic
membrane. ¤ inflammation of the ipsilateral tympanic
cavity during surgery including inflammation of the mucosa and/or glue
ear. ¶ Comparison of continuous values, shown as
median [Q1;Q3], using Student t-test. * Data analysed with Fisher’s
exact test (other values were analysed with Pearson’s Chi-squared test). |
Results are shown by Number (percentage). Percentages of satisfactory
and unsatisfactory results were calculated using the total number ears
with this risk factor as the denominator. Percentages of total number of
ears presenting the risk factor were calculated regarding the total
number of ears analysed at 1-year follow-up (n=139). Statistically
significant results are in bold. † all cranio-facial
anomalies including velopalatal clefts. ‡
tympanoplasty for perforation, retraction pocket or cholesteatoma.
§ perforation size greater than half the tympanic
membrane. ¤ inflammation of the ipsilateral tympanic
cavity during surgery including inflammation of the mucosa and/or glue
ear. ¶ Comparison of continuous values, shown as
median [Q1;Q3], using Student t-test. * Data analysed with Fisher’s
exact test (other values were analysed with Pearson’s Chi-squared test). |
Results are shown by Number (percentage). Percentages of satisfactory
and unsatisfactory results were calculated using the total number ears
with this risk factor as the denominator. Percentages of total number of
ears presenting the risk factor were calculated regarding the total
number of ears analysed at 1-year follow-up (n=139). Statistically
significant results are in bold. † all cranio-facial
anomalies including velopalatal clefts. ‡
tympanoplasty for perforation, retraction pocket or cholesteatoma.
§ perforation size greater than half the tympanic
membrane. ¤ inflammation of the ipsilateral tympanic
cavity during surgery including inflammation of the mucosa and/or glue
ear. ¶ Comparison of continuous values, shown as
median [Q1;Q3], using Student t-test. * Data analysed with Fisher’s
exact test (other values were analysed with Pearson’s Chi-squared test). |
Results are shown by Number (percentage). Percentages of satisfactory
and unsatisfactory results were calculated using the total number ears
with this risk factor as the denominator. Percentages of total number of
ears presenting the risk factor were calculated regarding the total
number of ears analysed at 1-year follow-up (n=139). Statistically
significant results are in bold. † all cranio-facial
anomalies including velopalatal clefts. ‡
tympanoplasty for perforation, retraction pocket or cholesteatoma.
§ perforation size greater than half the tympanic
membrane. ¤ inflammation of the ipsilateral tympanic
cavity during surgery including inflammation of the mucosa and/or glue
ear. ¶ Comparison of continuous values, shown as
median [Q1;Q3], using Student t-test. * Data analysed with Fisher’s
exact test (other values were analysed with Pearson’s Chi-squared
test). |