Tables
Table 1. Classification success of specimens from different regions by
random forest (RF) models (based on Acartia bifilosa, A. clausi,
A. danae, A. negligens, A. longiremis, A. tonsa, Calanus finmarchicus,
C. helgolandicus, C. glacialis, C. hyperboreus, Centropages bradyi , C.
kroyeri, C. typicus, C. hamatus, C. chierchiae, Metridia longa, M.
lucens, Pseudocalanus elongatus, P. moultoni, Temora longicornis, T.
sytlifera, Paraeuchaeta norvegica, Microcalanus sp., Anomalocera
patersonii, Nannocalanus minor, Eurytemora affinis) excluding specimens
from the respective region; region: abbreviation see Fig. 1, N = number
of specimens, RF error = rate of false negative specimens, RF error
corr. = rate false negative specimens after post hoc test for false
positive discovery (Rossel and Martinez Arbizu 2018a), rejec. rate =
rate of specimen identified as false positive by post hoc test, mean
dist. intra-reg. = mean intra-regional Euclidean distance, mean dist.
inter-reg. (max) = mean inter-regional Euclidean distance, only the
highest distance within the species is given