a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|
a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|
a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|
a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|
a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|
a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|
a Clustering was carried out in each of 19 phyla using
the UPGMA algorithm.
b The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
|