Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|
Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|
Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|
Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|
Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|
Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|
Note: The neutrality values with statistically non-significant
correlation coefficient R (p-value > 0.05) are marked with
symbol (*).
a The designation “Protozoa” was used to identify
Apicomplexa and Euglenozoa, since kingdom of these phyla is not
determined in the NCBI Taxonomy.
b Phyla were divided by the direction of the
mutational pressure and sorted by average GC content.
c The value of equilibrium point was calculated as
\(\frac{\mathrm{A}_{\mathrm{0}}}{\left(\mathrm{1-\varepsilon}\right)}\),
where A0 is a value computed from regression of
GC1,2 and GC3 at GC3 =
0
|