REFERENCES
1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
American Society for Reproductive Medicine position statement on uterus
transplantation: a committee opinion. Fertility and sterility .
2018;110:605-10.
2. Johannesson L, Testa G, Putman JM, McKenna GJ, Koon EC, York JR, et
al. Twelve Live Births After Uterus Transplantation in the Dallas UtErus
Transplant Study. Obstetrics and gynecology . 2021;137:241-49.
3. Jones BP, Saso S, Bracewell-Milnes T, Thum MY, Nicopoullos J,
Diaz-Garcia C, et al. Human uterine transplantation: a review of
outcomes from the first 45 cases. BJOG : an international journal
of obstetrics and gynaecology . 2019;126:1310-19.
4. Tummers P, Goker M, Dahm-Kahler P, Brannstrom M, Tullius SG, Rogiers
X, et al. Meeting Report: First State-of-the-Art Meeting on Uterus
Transplantation. Transplantation . 2019;103:455-58.
5. Testa G, McKenna GJ, Bayer J, Wall A, Fernandez H, Martinez E, et al.
The Evolution of Transplantation From Saving Lives to Fertility
Treatment: DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study). Ann Surg .
2020;272:411-17.
6. Richards EG, Agatisa PK, Davis AC, Flyckt R, Mabel H, Falcone T, et
al. Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor
infertility: Insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant
trial participants. AJOB empirical bioethics . 2019;10:23-35.
7. Jarvholm S, Enskog A, Hammarling C, Dahm-Kahler P, Brannstrom M.
Uterus transplantation: joys and frustrations of becoming a ’complete’
woman-a qualitative study regarding self-image in the 5-year period
after transplantation. Hum Reprod . 2020;35:1855-63.
8. Wall AE, Johannesson L, Sok M, Warren AM, Gordon EJ, Testa G.
Decision making and informed consent in uterus transplant recipients: A
mixed-methods study of the Dallas uterus transplant study (DUETS)
participants. Am J Surg . 2021.
9. Wall AE, Johannesson L, Testa G, Warren AM. Two Cases of Pregnancy
Following Uterine Transplant: An Ethical Analysis. Narrat Inq
Bioeth . 2020;10:263-68.
10. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting
qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and
focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care . 2007;19:349-57.
11. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods
Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2007.
12. Kleinman A, Benson P. Anthropology in the clinic: the problem of
cultural competency and how to fix it. PLoS Med . 2006;3:e294.
13. Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Brownlee S, Diefenbach M, Leventhal EA,
Patrick-Miller L, et al. Illness representations: Theoretical
foundations. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA, editors. Perceptions of health
and illness: Current research and applications. London: Harwood Academic
Publishers; 1997. p. 19–45.
14. Wall AE, Johannesson L, Testa G, Warren AM, Gordon EM. Developing
interview guides for a mixed methods study of uterus transplant
recipients, their living donors, and their respective partners. Ethical
issues in Uterus Transplantation and Innovative Research in Reproductive
Medicine, Preconference of the International Society of Uterus
Transplantation. Cleveland, OH.; 2019.
15. Testa G, Koon EC, Johannesson L, McKenna GJ, Anthony T, Klintmalm
GB, et al. Living Donor Uterus Transplantation: A Single Center’s
Observations and Lessons Learned From Early Setbacks to Technical
Success. American journal of transplantation : official journal of
the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of
Transplant Surgeons . 2017;17:2901-10.
16. Johannesson L, Koon EC, Bayer J, McKenna GJ, Wall A, Fernandez H, et
al. DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): Early Outcomes and
Complications of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy for Living Uterus Donors.Transplantation . 2021;105:225-30.
17. Ramani A, Testa G, Ghouri Y, Koon EC, Di Salvo M, McKenna GJ, et al.
DUETS (Dallas UtErus Transplant Study): Complete report of 6-month and
initial 2-year outcomes following open donor hysterectomy.Clinical transplantation . 2020;34:e13757.
18. Testa G, McKenna GJ, Gunby RT, Jr., Anthony T, Koon EC, Warren AM,
et al. First live birth after uterus transplantation in the United
States. American journal of transplantation : official journal of
the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of
Transplant Surgeons . 2018;18:1270-74.
19. QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo (Version 12). 2018 [cited 11 June
2021]; Available from:
https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
20. Srnka KJ, Koeszegi ST. From Words to Numbers: How to Transform
Qualitative Data into Meaningful Quantitative Results.Schmalenbach Bus Rev . 2007;59:29-57.
21. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Teddlie C. A Framework for Analyzing Data in Mixed
Methods Research In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, editors. Handbook of Mixed
Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage;
2003. p. 351-83.
22. Caracelli VJ, Greene JC. Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method
Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis .
1993;15:195-207.
23. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Qualitative methods. Research
design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2018. p. 179-212.
24. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. 2014 [cited 11 June 2021]; Available from:
http://www.R-project.org/