2.3 Data analysis
The documents were first analysed by three members of the research team
(two in the UK, one in NL) using the safety and personalisation
checklist previously described (Supplementary File 1). Relevant data
segments were extracted and recorded in excel files. Analytical
frameworks were established for each domain through repeated and
extensive discussion by the three researchers, and then reviewed by all
authors.
The interviews were transcribed and anonymised and then subjected to
open coding supported by the MAXQDA software package (v18.2.5) by two
members of the research team (one UK, one NL). Open coding was conducted
in the native language by English or Dutch speaking researchers. Codes
were grouped together into categories across the open coding for each
country to develop a framework through discussion.
The documentary and interview analytical frameworks were interpreted
together within each domain to explore relationships within and between
the categories. This led to explanation of the policy drivers in both
countries. Differences in opinion in the research team were resolved
with mutual agreement. The research team consisted of nine women from a
range of academic and clinical backgrounds including midwifery,
psychology, and sociology.
3. Findings
In the first paragraph we present the similarities and differences in
maternity care policy between the UK and NL during the COVID-19 pandemic
for each of the chosen domains. This paragraph has a documentary focus.
The second paragraph describes the policy drivers behind these
similarities and differences and is more interview-based.