What’s Known
·        It is stated that the direct and indirect psychological and social effects of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are widespread and it will adversely affect mental health.
·        Parents experience many stress factors such the closure of schools and care facilities, continuation of education at home, parents' being unable to hug their children with the fear of contamination and obligation to go to work.
·        Solution-Focused Support Program (SFSP) is a short, resource-oriented and goal-oriented therapeutic approach that helps individuals change by creating solutions.
What’s New
·        This is the first study which investigates the effect of SFSP applied to parents with high level of anxiety in the COVID-19 pandemic on reducing anxiety.
·        It has been found that SFSP applied to parents with high level of anxiety is an effective method in reducing the state anxiety levels of parents.
·        Considering the advantages of applying SFSP in a short time and its rapid effect, it is recommended that SFSP should be applied to parents in order to minimize their anxiety levels during pandemic.
Introduction
Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly across the world and caused a pandemic.1 The COVID-19 pandemic not only affected individuals in social, economic and mental areas, but also a significant change occurred in their lifestyle.1,2
It is stated that the direct and indirect psychological and social effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are widespread and it will adversely affect mental health now or in the future.2 A serious anxiety response occurs in people living in the regions where the pandemic is experienced.3 Studies have revealed that anxiety, depression and sleep problems are common in adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.4–6 Previous studies have examined the mental health effects associated with other infectious disease outbreaks including the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic,7 2009 novel influenza A (H1N1) pandemic,8 and 2014-2016 Ebola pandemic.9 As a matter of fact, the detection of symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder in those affected by previous pandemics shows that similar problems may be experienced in the current process.
The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in enormous disruptions to family life.10 In addition to a sudden change in work life, family life and social life routines, economic problems and fear of pandemic negatively has affected the well-being of parents.11 During this period, parents experience many stress factors such the closure of schools and care facilities, continuation of education at home, parents' being unable to hug their children with the fear of contamination and obligation to go to work. Parents also may feel fear and uncertainty about how to keep their families safe.12 All these issues may reveal mental problems in parents and cause existing problems to get worse at the same time. In addition, it is predicted that the COVID-19 pandemic will not only cause mental problems but also cause an increase in future anxiety.13 High levels of anxiety in parents are also important in terms of causing an increase in children's anxiety10 and increasing the risk of harsh parenting and maltreatment.14 The psychosocial effects of the pandemic may occur over a long period of time on the parent and child population. For this reason, it is critical to minimize the negative effects that may be experienced in the long term by implementing early interventions to reduce the level of anxiety.
Solution-Focused Support Program (SFSP) is a short, resource-oriented and goal-oriented therapeutic approach that helps individuals change by creating solutions.15 It is a therapy method that focuses on individuals’ becoming aware of their potential revealing their strengths.16,17 Focusing on the solution can increase the self‐confidence of individuals, their capacity to produce solutions, and their ability to see their strengths and positive aspects.18 It is reported in the literature that short-term therapies provide faster benefits than long-term psychotherapies.19 For this reason, it is thought that short-term therapies will be applied in a short time and have a rapid effect in reducing the anxiety of parents during the pandemic. In the light of this information, it is aimed to determine the anxiety levels of parents with children between the ages of 3-6 in the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine the effects of online SFSP, which is planned to be given to parents with high anxiety levels in the study. This study differed from previous studies as it was carried out with the participation of parents living in the South-eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. In this study, identifying parents' anxiety level and effects of online SFSP by applying a unique measurement instrument was also an important aim.
Research hypotheses are as follows;
H1 SFSP is an effective method in reducing the state anxiety levels of parents with children aged 3-6.
H2 SFSP is an effective method in reducing trait anxiety levels of parents with children aged 3-6.
Methods
Study Design
The study was conducted using a randomized controlled research design. A parallel trial design was used describing an experimental group and a control group as the two arm. This study was guided by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) checklist.20
Participants
The study was carried out in a province located in the South-eastern part of Turkey between June-December 2020. The study population consisted of parents with children aged 3-6 years. The parents of this age group formed the sample of the study, considering that children in this age group could not attend nursery school due to the pandemic, could not properly transfer their energies due to staying at home all day, and were more dependent on their parents for care, education, and the establishment and maintenance of individual games.
In line with the inclusion criteria, parents with children aged 3-6 years who attended a day care centre or nursery during the pre-pandemic period, who had had a pre-test anxiety scale score above 40, a computer or internet infrastructure at home and volunteered to participate in the study were included in the research. Parents who had communication problems, had a pre-test anxiety scale score below 40, not volunteered to participate in the study, used drugs for anxiety or depression, did not have a computer or internet environment, did not attend at least one session were excluded from the study.
Sample Size
The sample size was calculated based on the study conducted by Yıldırım and Aylaz (2019) to determine the effect of solution-focused group counselling on the anxiety levels of individuals with nutrition disorder. According to the results of this study, the post-process STAI anxiety score was reported as 40.45 ± 9.22 in the intervention group and 46.73 ± 8.83 in the control group. The influence quantity of the study was determined as d = 0.839.21 The sample size was calculated using G*Power22 with a large effect size of 0.84, probability of alpha error .05, a power (1-β) of 0.80 to perform two independent group model. Minimum sample size was 68, totally. Considering the possible data loss during the study process, it was decided to conduct the study with a total of 90 parents, 45 parents in both groups.
Pre-test was applied until 90 parents with high anxiety levels (whose STAI-S and STAI-T scores were above 40) and volunteering to participate in the study were reached. The snowball sampling method was used in the study due to quarantine and isolation measures. With the snowball sampling method that was used in the study, a few participants were contacted initially, other participants were contacted with the help of these few participants, and the sample was formed in a sequential fashion. Pre-test was applied to 102 parents in this process. Parents who did not meet the inclusion criteria were not included in the study (n=12).
Parents who were included in the study (n = 90) were assigned to intervention (n = 45) and control (n = 45) groups randomly using a randomization program. Eight parents from the intervention group and five parents from the control group were not included in the evaluation process for various reasons (not completing the sessions, not completing the final test). Thus, a total of 77 parents were included in the study, 37 of whom were in the intervention group (SFSP) and 40 of whom were in the control group (no intervention) (Fig. 1).
Randomisation
The randomisation sequence is performed in permuted blocks of variable sizes stratified for trial site using centralised, concealed allocation. The randomisation sequence is generated 1:1 (intervention/control) ratio to each arm using the online randomisation software ‘Sealed Envelope’ (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/).
Measurements
A descriptive information form which was prepared by the researchers in line with the literature3,10,21,23,24 and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory were used for collecting the data of the study.
Introductory Information Form consists of 21 questions for evaluating the socio-demographic characteristics of the parents (age, gender, socioeconomic status, etc.) and their views and behaviours during the pandemic period (living areas affected by the pandemic, coping behaviours, etc.). 
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
It was developed by Spielberg et al. in 1970 in order to measure the trait and state anxiety levels of individuals and adapted to Turkish by Öner and Le Compte (1983).25 State-Trait Anxiety Inventory includes a total of forty items which are the State Anxiety Scale consisting of 20 items and the Trait Anxiety Scale consisting of 20 items. The State Anxiety Sub-Scale (STAI-S) requires the individuals to describe how they feel at a certain time and under certain conditions while the Trait Anxiety Sub-Scale (STAI-T) requires the individuals to describe how they feel in general. In the State Anxiety Scale, the response choices collected in four classes are (1) Not at all, (2) somewhat, (3) Moderately so, and (4) Very much so while the response choices for Trait Anxiety Scale are (1) Almost never, (2) Sometimes, (3) Often and (4) Almost always. The scores obtained from the scales theoretically vary between 20 and 80. High score indicates high level of anxiety while low score indicates low level of anxiety. Reliability coefficient of the scale was found between 0.94 and 0.96 for the "State Anxiety Scale" and between 0.83 and 0.87 for the "Trait Anxiety Scale". Based on these data, it is understood that Turkish scales have high item homogeneity and internal consistency.26,27 For this study, Cronbach alpha coefficients for state and trait anxiety subscales were found to be 0.90 and 0.85, respectively.
Data Collection
The data of the study were collected through a questionnaire form which was created through the Google-Forms programme. Google Forms is an online application through which only the participants and researchers can have access to data. Thus, the confidentiality of study data was ensured. Besides, the survey form designed not to allow any respondent to submit the form before answering all questions prevented the respondents from submitting a survey form with missing data. Duplicate entries were prevented by allowing one submission for each participant’s Google account. Firstly, the parents who agreed to participate in the study were asked to complete the informed consent form designed in Google Forms. In the first telephone conversation with the parents assigned to the experiment and control groups, information was given about the study. The forms were sent to the parents as an online link and they were asked to fill the form. In the information form, a space was provided for the participants to write their phone numbers voluntarily. In this way, parents with high levels of anxiety were contacted by phone and asked whether they would like to participate in the online SFSP program. Online SFSP was applied to the parents who wanted to participate in the program via video conferencing. The programme was prepared and implemented by a researcher holding a "Solution-Focused Consulting Approach" certificate. SFSP provides short-term consultancy that focuses on the solution rather than the problem encountered. The programme was implemented as four sessions each of which lasted 40-50 minutes in average. We applied the SFSP with four session because it was reported that is most effective in the 3- to 5-session range.23,28 Each session was conducted with the participation of six to eight parents using video conferencing method. The same participants were in the group all sessions. Interviews were held at the time determined with the participants and when they were available. Data collection forms were applied to the intervention group after the programme to the control group approximately one month after the pre-test and the data collection was completed for the study. During the study period, participants in both groups received no pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment for decreasing anxiety or increasing mental health.
Intervention
Firstly, national and international literature review was conducted in order to develop this programme.23,29–35 Expert opinions were also asked in the development of the programme. Framework of the programme, which was developed within the scope of this study, was prepared depending on the basic philosophy, principles and techniques of the solution-oriented approach. The sessions of the prepared programme are briefly as follows:
Session 1: Getting acquainted (In this session, it was aimed to meet the group members, explain the goals and rules of the group, give brief information about the basic philosophy and principles of the solution-oriented approach, explain the programme process, share thoughts about the pandemic, create positive goals, discover what they do well and make a connection between now and the future. Homework: Explaining the concerns about the pandemic).
Session 2: Miracle Question – Awareness of Exceptions and Alternatives (In this session, it was aimed to raise awareness for change, create positive change expectation in group members, make group members think about solutions, make them aware of their effects on solutions and their own resources, Homework: journal keeping, positive thinking techniques)
Session 3: Coping Skills (In this session, it was aimed to discuss group members' ability to cope with obstacles in achieving the goal, discuss solutions by recognizing useful things, try more useful things and be able to transfer them. Homework: relaxation exercises, breathing exercises).
Session 4: Positive Design of the Future and Finalization (In this session, it was aimed to design the future in a positive way, discuss how to reach a positive future and evaluate the gains from the group process for finalization, receive feedback on the programme process, make an overall evaluation of the group process and finalize the group process).
Data analysis
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 22 programme (v. 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for the analysis of the research data. Percentage and mean were used to examine the distribution of sociodemographic characteristics and chi-square test was used to examine difference between the groups. The normality of the parameters in the study data was checked with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Since the data provided parametric assumptions, Paired t test was used to compare the means of scales between the intervention and control groups. To determine the effect of SFSP on state and trait anxiety levels the "Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)" was used in Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS) 23 application. An alpha level of .05 was used for all statistical tests. Cronbach alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency of the scales.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical permission was obtained from the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of the Inönü University with the resolution number 02.06.2020/751. Since the inclusion of the human phenomenon in the study requires the protection of individual rights, "Informed Consent" condition was fulfilled as an ethical principle. In addition to explaining "Autonomy" principles, the individuals participating in the study were informed that they could withdraw from the research before the data was started to be collected, their identity information would be kept confidential and not shared with third parties in order to comply with the "Protection of Privacy" ethical principles. After the last scale was administered to the experimental and control groups, group counseling was offered to the individuals in the control group upon their wishes.