Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest All authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Ethical approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the Einstein Healthcare Network and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Reference
1. Sarris GE, Polimenakos AC.Three-Dimensional Modeling in Congenital and Structural Heart Perioperative Care and Education: A Path in Evolution. Pediatr Cardiol 2017;38:883-885.
2. Mowers KL, Fullerton JB, Hicks D, et al. 3D Echocardiography Provides Highly Accurate 3D Printed Models in Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2021;42:131-141.
3. Loke YH, Harahsheh AS, Krieger A, et al. Usage of 3D models of tetralogy of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart disease. BMC Med Educ 2017; 17:54.
4. Ghisiawan N, Herbert CE, Zussman M, et al. The use of a three-dimensional print model of an aortic arch to plan a complex percutaneous intervention in a patient with coarctation of the aorta. Cardiol Young 2016;26: 1568-1572.
5. Bhatla P, Tretter JT, Ludomirsky A, et al. Utility and Scope of Rapid Prototyping in Patients with Complex Muscular Ventricular Septal Defects or Double-Outlet Right Ventricle: Does it Alter Management Decisions? Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38: 103-114.
6. Byrne N, Velasco FM, Tandon A, et al. A systematic review of image segmentation methodology, used in the additive manufacture of patient-specific 3D printed models of the cardiovascular system. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2016; 5:401155419.
7. Faganello G, Campana C, Belgrano M, et al. Three dimensional printing of an atrial septal defect: Is it multimodality imaging? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;
32:427-428.
8. Vukicevic M, Faza NN, Avenatti E, et al. Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional Printed Modeling of the Tricuspid Valve for MitraClip Procedure Planning. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging 2020;13: e010376.
9. Luo H, Xu Y, Wang Z, Liu Y, et al. Three-Dimensional Printing Model-Guided Percutaneous Closure of Atrial Septal Defect. Arq Bras Cardiol 2017;108:484-485.
10. Mathur M, Patil P, Bove A. The Role of 3D Printing in Structural Heart Disease: All That Glitters Is Not Gold. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2015; 8: 987-988.
11. Muraru D, Veronesi F, Maddalozzo A, et al. 3D printing of normal and pathologic tricuspid valves from transthoracic 3D echocardiography data sets. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;18:802-808.
12. Dan Jia, Qing Zhou, Hong-ning Song, et al. The value of the left atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in the choice of device size of LAmbreā„¢ occlude. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2019;35:1841-1851.
13. Hascoet S, Hadeed K, Marchal P, et al.The relation between atrial septal defect shape, diameter, and area using three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography and balloon sizing during percutaneous closure in children. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;16:747-755.
14. Turner DR, Owada CY, Sang CJ, et al. Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects With the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder: A Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Approval Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:e004212.
15. Smerling J, Marboe CC, Lefkowitch JH, et al. Utility of 3D Printed Cardiac Models for Medical Student Education in Congenital Heart Disease: Across a Spectrum of Disease Severity. Pediatr Cardiol 2019; 40:1258-1265.
16. Zhu Y, Liu J, Wang L, Guan X, et al. Preliminary study of the application of transthoracic echocardiography-guided three-dimensional printing for the assessment of structural heart disease. Echocardiography 2017;34:1903-1908.
17. Ma Y, Ding P, Li L, et al.Three-dimensional printing for heart diseases: clinical application review. Biodes Manuf 2021:1-13.
18. He L, Cheng GS, Du YJ, et al. Feasibility of Device Closure for Multiple Atrial Septal Defects With an Inferior Sinus Venosus Defect: Procedural Planning Using Three-Dimensional Printed Models. Heart Lung Circ 2020;29:914-920.
19. Mashari A, Montealegre-Gallegos M, Knio Z, et al. Making three-dimensional echocardiography more tangible: a workflow for three-dimensional printing with echocardiographic data. Echo Res Pract 2016;3:R57-64.
20. Nakayama R, Takaya Y, Akagi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of atrial septal defect closure using Occlutech Figulla Flex II compared with Amplatzer Septal Occluder. Heart Vessels 2021;36:704-709.
21. Kitakata H, Itabashi Y, Kanazawa H, et al. Appropriate device selection for transcatheter atrial septal defect closure using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2021;37:1159-1168.
22. Boon I, Vertongen K, Paelinck BP, et al. How to Size ASDs for Percutaneous Closure. Pediatr Cardiol 2018;39: 168-175.
23. Jang JY, Heo R, Cho MS, et al.Efficacy of 3D transoesophageal echocardiography for transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defect without balloon sizing. European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging 2018;19:684-689.
24. Meier LM, Meineri M, Qua HJ, et al. Structural and congenital heart disease interventions: the role of three-dimensional printing.Neth Heart J 2017;25:65-75.
25. Sa YK, Park CS, Cho EJ, et al. Single device transcatheter closure for double atrial septal defect under real time three-dimensional image guidanceĀ [published online ahead of print Jul 15 ,2021]. The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2021.094.
26. Yan C, Wang C, Pan X, et al.Three-dimensional printing assisted transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect with deficient posterior-inferior rim. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018;92:1309-1314.