Explanatory variables Emmeans test Figures
nDF dDF Test p.adjust: Tukey p value
Diversity measures
Richness Chi2
Grassland type 3 - 19.23 Agri - Mount 0.00 Fig 2. a
Arid - Mount 0.00
Calc - Mount 0.00
Season 1 - 13.619 Dry - Wet 0.00 Fig 2. d
Cover Ftest
Grassland type 3 8 21.534 Agri - Mount 0.00 Fig 2. b
Arid - Mount 0.00
Calc - Mount 0.01
Prairie dog disturbance 1 35 4.1815 WOP - WP 0.05 Fig 2. e
Evenness Chi2
Grassland type 3 - 20.227 Agri - Mount 0.00 Fig 2. c
Arid - Mount 0.02
FSpe Chi2
Grassland type 3 - 2.6884 -
Prairie dog disturbance 1 - 10.0014 -
Grassland type x Prairie dog disturbance 3 - 31.6835 Agri WOP - Agri WP 0.00 Fig 2. f
Agri WOP - Arid WP 0.02
RaoQ F-test
Prairie dog disturbance 1 34 26.501
Season 1 34 8.3085
Prairie dog disturbance x Season 1 33 81.689 WOP Dry - WP Dry 0.00 Fig 2. g
WOP Dry - WOP Wet 0.00
WOP Dry - WP Wet 0.00
WP Dry - WOP Wet 0.04
WP Dry - WP Wet 0.03
Traits
Perennial cover F-test
Grassland type 3 8 8.0027 Agri - Mount 0.01 Fig 3. a
Arid - Mount 0.01
Erect cover F-test
Grassland type 3 8 13.506 Agri - Mount 0.01 Fig 3. b
Arid - Mount 0.00
Calc - Mount 0.01
Prairie dog disturbance - - - - ns
Graminoid cover F-test
Grassland type 3 8 10.848 Agri - Mount 0.01 Fig 3. c
Arid - Mount 0.00
Calc - Mount 0.04
Prairie dog disturbance 1 34 2.7661
Season 1 34 1.6083
Prairie dog disturbance x Season 1 33 4.3516 WOP Dry - WP Dry 0.05 Fig 3. i
C4 cover F-test
Grassland type 3 8 5.6564 Agri - Mount 0.03 Fig 3. d
Arid - Mount 0.03
Prairie dog disturbance 1 34 5.7729 WOP - WP 0.02 Fig 3. h
Annual cover F-test
Season 1 34 15.677 Dry - Wet 0.00 Fig 3. e
Forb cover F-test
Season 1 34 12.338 Dry - Wet 0.00 Fig 3. f
CWM Leaf area cover F-test
Prairie dog disturbance 1 34 3.0352 ns
Season 1 34 6.6564 Dry - Wet 0.01 Fig 3. g
The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect. *The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect. *The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect. *The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect. *The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect. *The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect. *The table shows the test type Chi2 and F-test. nDF= numerator degrees of freedom, dDF0= denominator degrees of freedom. Emmeans test p-adjust: Tukey= comparisons of levels within the variables from Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test that show weak to very strong evidence of having an effect.