Line |
Dataset |
Interaction |
Response variable |
Explanatory variable |
χ2 |
d.f. |
p |
Score / Post hoc comparison |
1 |
Observation |
14, 25 |
Aphid presence |
Ant presence :
Treatment |
22.454 |
2 |
<0.001 |
t = -1.745; Slopes
comparison: Control < Live gall exclusion (χ2(1) = 7.844, p =
0.010) |
2 |
|
9, 10 |
Predator abundance |
Treatment : Week |
40.055 |
15 |
<0.001 |
In week 2, Control > Ant exclusion
(χ2(1) = 11.823, p = 0.020), and Live gall excluded (χ2(1) = 14.744, p =
0.008) |
3 |
Dissection |
21 |
Aphid per gall |
G7 Parasitism (binary) |
4.897 |
1 |
0.026 |
t = 2.325 |
4 |
|
11 |
|
Treatment |
7.157 |
2 |
0.027 |
Control >
Ant exclusion (χ2(1) = 7.526, p = 0.018) |
5 |
|
16 |
G7 Parasitism |
Treatment |
8.175 |
2 |
0.016 |
Control
> Hatched gall exclusion (χ2(1) = 7.972, p =
0.014) |
6 |
|
8 |
G7 volume |
G7 nymphs per gall : Treatment |
10.317 |
2 |
0.005 |
t = 2.061; Slopes comparison: Control < Ant exclusion
(χ2(1) = 10.359, p = 0.003) |
7 |
|
1 |
|
Aphid per gall |
8.162 |
1 |
0.004 |
t =
-2.872 |
8 |
|
1 |
G7 nymph mortality |
Aphid per gall |
5.924 |
1 |
0.014 |
t
= 2.520 |
9 |
|
2 |
Parasitoid mortality |
Inquilinism (binary) |
10.129 |
1 |
0.001 |
t = 3.465 |
10 |
Observation /Dissection |
23, 29 |
Aphid per gall |
Predator
abundance : Treatment |
6.729 |
2 |
0.034 |
t = 2.402; Slopes
comparison: Control > Hatched exclusion (χ2(1) = 6.220, p =
0.037) |
11 |
|
17 |
|
Hatched abundance |
4.963 |
1 |
0.025 |
t =
1.255 |
12 |
|
20, 28 |
G7 abundance |
Herbivore abundance : Treatment |
9.925 |
2 |
0.007 |
t = -2.610; Slopes comparison: Control <
Hatched exclusion (χ2(1) = 6.102, p = 0.040) |
13 |
|
12, 27 |
G7 Parasitism |
Ant presence : Treatment |
8.137 |
1 |
0.004 |
z = 2.687; Slopes comparison: Control > Hatched
excluded (χ2(1) = 7.840, p = 0.005) |
14 |
|
22 |
|
Predator abundance |
21.054 |
1 |
<0.001 |
z =
4.376 |
15 |
|
15 |
|
Aphid presence |
8.014 |
1 |
0.004 |
z =
-2.811 |
16 |
|
13, 26 |
G10 abundance |
Ant presence : Treatment |
4.770 |
1 |
0.028 |
t = 2.668; Slopes comparison: Control > Hatched
exclusion (χ2(1) = 4.654, p = 0.030) |
17 |
|
18 |
|
Hatched abundance |
4.134 |
1 |
0.042 |
t =
-2.714 |
18 |
|
24 |
|
Predator abundance |
6.452 |
1 |
0.011 |
t =
2.609 |
19 |
|
19 |
G10 parasitism |
Hatched abundance |
4.768 |
1 |
0.028 |
z
= 2.085 |
Note: p‐Values were generated by likelihood ratio tests of the full
model (generalised linear mixed effect model, generalised linear model)
with and without the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were
generated by likelihood ratio tests of the full model (generalised
linear mixed effect model, generalised linear model) with and without
the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were generated by likelihood
ratio tests of the full model (generalised linear mixed effect model,
generalised linear model) with and without the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were generated by likelihood ratio tests of the full
model (generalised linear mixed effect model, generalised linear model)
with and without the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were
generated by likelihood ratio tests of the full model (generalised
linear mixed effect model, generalised linear model) with and without
the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were generated by likelihood
ratio tests of the full model (generalised linear mixed effect model,
generalised linear model) with and without the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were generated by likelihood ratio tests of the full
model (generalised linear mixed effect model, generalised linear model)
with and without the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were
generated by likelihood ratio tests of the full model (generalised
linear mixed effect model, generalised linear model) with and without
the explanatory variables. |
Note: p‐Values were generated by likelihood
ratio tests of the full model (generalised linear mixed effect model,
generalised linear model) with and without the explanatory
variables. |