Clinical outcome of individuals carrying 5T;TG12 in trans with
CFTR variants with varying clinical consequences
To the Editor,
according to the CFTR2 database (https://cftr2.org/), 5T;TG12 is aCystic Fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator(CFTR ) variant with varying clinical consequences (VVCC), because
when it is combined with a CF-causing variant on the other CFTRallele the whole clinical spectrum of CF phenotypes may appear including
CF, CFTR-related disorders (CFTR-RD), or the absence of disease. It is
very common in the Italian population, especially in infants with cystic
fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic
syndrome/cystic fibrosis screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis
(CRMS/CFSPID)1-3 In a recent study we observed that
34.9% (45/129) of Italian subjects with F508del/5T;TG12 genotype were
diagnosed as CF after a median follow-up of 6.7 years. Most of these
patients had mild lung disease with pancreatic sufficiency and a low
prevalence of CF-related complications.4 To date few
data are available on the long-term outcome of subjects with 5T;TG12in trans with another VVCC and here we report the clinical course
of an Italian cohort.
We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical records of all
patients regularly monitored at six CF centres in Italy until 30 May
2021, who carried at least one 5T;TG12 CFTR variant in
trans with another CFTR variant. We then focused on individuals
carrying on the second allele a variant classified as VVCC according to
CFTR2 database. The study was approved by the Ethical committee of the
coordinator centre (Florence, Ethics Clearance number 328/2021).
Informed consent was obtained from all patients (or from their legal
guardians) for the use of anonymous clinical data for research purposes.
During the follow‐up, we reclassified patients as: i) CF, in the
presence of pathological sweat chloride (SC) (≥ 60 mmol/L)
value;5 ii) CFTR‐RD, in presence of clinical
manifestations not meeting diagnostic criteria for
CF.6 We maintained the CRMS/CFSPID definition for
asymptomatic infants identified by newborn screening (NBS) with a SC
persistently in intermediate or normal range.1 All
enrolled individuals had CFTR exons sequenced (detection rate
98%) and multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification.
We identified 27 subjects (median age as on 30 May: 10.74 ± 12.02
years), of which 12 homozygous for 5T;TG12 (median age 15.42 ± 15.55
years) and 15 carrying a VVCC on the second allele (median age 7.0 ±
6.77 years) (Table 1). Eighteen (66.7%) out of 27 were identified by
NBS, while the remaining were diagnosed by symptoms. Four (14.8%) were
adult patients. At the first evaluation, 18 (66.7%) were CRMS/CFSPID
(15 in presence of a SC value < 30 mmol/L and 3 with SC 40–59
mmol/L), 8 (29.6%) CFTR-RD (4 identified for family history, 2 for
respiratory symptoms and the other 2 for acute pancreatitis and
congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD), respectively)
and one (3.7%) had a CF diagnosis at 21 years for pathological SC (62
mmol/L) performed in presence of CBAVD and bronchiectasis at computed
tomography scan (Table 1).
After a mean follow up of 4 ± 3.22 years only one asymptomatic
CRMS/CFSPID progressed to a CF diagnosis for pathological SC (112 mEq/l)
at 4 years. Among CFTR-RD subjects (median age at 30 May: 22 ± 16.3
years), after a mean follow up of 7 ± 4.2 years, there were no
diagnostic changes, so at study end 2 (7.4%) out of 27 individuals had
a CF diagnosis. At study end all individuals had pancreatic sufficiency.
Forced expiratory volume in the 1st second (FEV1) was evaluated in 8
subjects, resulting 105.8%±19.5 (range 88.2-141.0%). Only one patient,
classified as CF had chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization.
Interestingly, among the 8 cases diagnosed as CFTR-RD, there were four
asymptomatic subjects identified for family history and with normal SC
or in intermediate range. They had been classified as CFTR-RD on the
basis of the genotype (three homozygous for 5T;TG12 and one double
heterozygous for 5T;TG12 and D579G variant). At the end of the study,
they had no alterations of the sweat test to support a CF
diagnosis,5 and in the same way they had no mono-organ
involvement corresponding to the CFTR-RD
classification.6 Given the implications for the
patients and management, give a correct and univocal label to these
subjects is a very challenging area that remains to be resolved.
No studies are available in the literature to compare our results with.
To date, CFTR2 database reports clinical data on 176 subjects with
5T;TG12, of which only 3 homozygous for this variant and all
asymptomatic. Furthermore 439 patients carrying 5T;TG12 are reported in
CFTR-France database
(https://cftr.iurc.montp.inserm.fr):
19 (4.3%) have CF, 384 (87.5%) CFTR-RD (the most of them, 280, in
presence of isolated CBAVD), 17 (3.9%) are asymptomatic subjects, one
(0.2%) identified for fetal bowel anomalies and 18 (4.1%) with a
pending diagnosis.
In our cohort we studied 10 individuals homozygous for 5T;TG12: one
patient had CBAVD, another who suffered from recurrent pancreatitis and
a third who had hypochloremic alkalosis. These patients were identified
in CF centre that include 5T;TG12 in the first level CFTR genetic
analysis.3
In conclusion, our data suggest that subjects with genotype 5T;TG12/VVCC
likely have a very low risk of progressing to CF, as compared to those
with F508del/5T;TG12.4 This observation could lead to
differentiate follow up in presence of at least one 5T;TG12.
Knowing these data is crucial to offer a useful counseling for
CRMS/CFSPID infants and for non‐CF adults with CBAVD alone. Anyway
further data are needed to evaluate the outcomes after a longer follow
up.