Figure Legends
Figure 1 : Total number of species (species richness) in different locations and in four field campaigns; A, B . based on subfamily level/separate lineages; C, D. assemblage sorted for body size.
Figure 2 : Dendrogram from species presence data. Results of a UPGMA clustering of localities is shown at the lower left of the figure, with 1000 bootstraps. Black square: Presence; White square: Absence.
Figure 3 : NMDS analyses of assemblages from single trapping events separated by lineages and different spatial and eco-spatial partitions; forest types (A-E ), elevation zones (F-J ), localities (K-O ) and habitats (P-T ). Partitions are enclosed by convex hulls. Multiple traps from one locality have the same colour and colours correspond to Figure S1.
Figure 4 : NMDS analyses assemblages separated by body size classes and different spatial and eco-spatial partitions; forest types (A-C ), elevation zones (D-F ), localities (G-I ) and habitats (J-L ). Partitions are enclosed by convex hulls. Multiple traps from one locality have the same colour and colours correspond to Figure S1.
Figure 5: Correlation between species compositional similarity (and pairwise geographic distance. A . assemblage sorted for body size; B . assemblage sorted for lineages.
Figure 6: NMDS analyses of assemblages from single trapping events separated by sampling locality in the course of four field campaigns (2019 I, 2019 II, 2020 I, 2020 II).