Invited mini-commentary on BJOG-22-0767.R1
Anne-Lotte L.F. van der Kooi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC–University Medical
Center, The Netherlands
The population of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors
grows steadily owing to increasing survival rates around the world.
Their reproductive health including infertility, as well as adverse
pregnancy outcomes, has therefore become a significant area of interest.
In this large retrospective cohort study of Desai et al. (Desai et al.
BJOG), the authors show an increased risk of premature birth and severe
maternal morbidity in AYA survivors. Almost one third of these increased
risks were mediated by maternal comorbidities. It is important to note
that while the cancer survivors in this commercially insured population
already had a fifty percent higher mean Maternal Comorbidity Index (1.8
vs 1.2), it is very well possible that comorbidity is even higher in the
population insured via, for example, Medicaid. The International
Guideline Harmonization Group has identified specific adverse pregnancy
related outcomes that are known to be increased in childhood, adolescent
and young adult cancer survivors, in order to characterize the
population that will benefit specifically from a preconception
consultation and pregnancy surveillance (van der Kooi et al. American
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2021. Volume 224, pages 3-15). As
multimorbidity is common in this population, understanding specific
treatment-related risks and its effect on the course of pregnancy is key
in optimal clinical management.
Desai et al. report in their cohort of AYA cancer survivors a twofold
increased prevalence of assisted reproductive technology (ART) use, but
observed no modification of the risk on perinatal outcomes due to ART.
This is reassuring, as the rapid growth in survival and fertility
preservation will further increase the number of women with cancer that
reproductive medicine units are caring for.
For individualized preconception consultation and pregnancy
surveillance, more data is needed on the, perhaps dose-related,
association between chemotherapy and radiotherapy and adverse pregnancy
outcomes. Desai et al. report that prior chemotherapy but not radiation
was associated with higher comorbidity index. Unfortunately, their
insurance data does not provide specifics of the chemotherapy with
regard to type and dosage. The subsequent observed increase in preterm
births could be a consequence of anthracyclines resulting in peripartum
cardiomyopathy and possibly iatrogenic prematurity, but also of
alkylating agents resulting in loss of elasticity or vascularization.
The lack of an association of radiotherapy with comorbidity index, or
with preterm birth, is surprising, as an earlier meta-analysis showed an
increased risk of premature delivery in cancer survivors treated with
radiotherapy (RR 2.27, 95%-CI 1.34 – 3.82) (van der Kooi et al.
European Journal of Cancer, 2019. Volume 111, pages 126 – 137) and
abdominal radiotherapy was associated with an increased risk of
premature delivery in childhood cancer survivors (RR 1.70, 95%-CI 1.21
- 2.38) (Reulen et al. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017.
Volume 109).
The growing body of evidence emphasizes the need for preconception and
prenatal surveillance as well as individualized pregnancy surveillance
in AYA cancer survivors. Maternal comorbidity, previous anthracycline
therapy, radiotherapy and possibly other chemotherapeutic agents warrant
informed medical management to prevent and manage adverse pregnancy
outcomes in this population that remains vulnerable with regard to the
full breadth of their reproductive health.