a – analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted analyses |
a
– analytical uncertainty from the concordia age Ludwig (1998); b –
systematic uncertainty of 2% (see text for discussion) (Spencer et al.,
2016); c – combined analytical and systematic uncertainty
([analytical uncertainty squared + systematic uncertainty
squared]1/2) (Spencer et al., 2016); d – mean square of the weighted
deviates for concordance; e – the mean square of the weighted deviates
for equivalence; f – chi squared p- value for concordance; g – chi
squared p- value for equivalence; h – number of attempted
analyses |