REFERENCES
Ackerley, R., Carlsson, I., Wester, H., Olausson, H., Backlund Wasling,
H., 2014a. Touch perceptions across skin sites: differences between
sensitivity, direction discrimination and pleasantness. Front. Behav.
Neurosci. 8, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00054
Ackerley, R., Backlund Wasling, H., Liljencrantz, J., Olausson, H.,
Johnson, R., Wessberg, J., 2014b. Human C-tactile afferents are tuned to
the temperature of a skin-stroking caress. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc.
Neurosci. 34, 2879–2883. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2847-13.2014
Ali, S.H., Makdani, A.D., Cordero, M.I., Paltoglou, A.E., Marshall,
A.G., McFarquhar, M.J., McGlone, F.P., Walker, S.C., Trotter, P.D.,
2023. Hold me or stroke me? Individual differences in static and dynamic
affective touch. PLOS ONE 18, e0281253.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281253
Aston-Jones, G., Cohen, J.D., 2005. An integrative theory of locus
coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal
performance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 28, 403–450.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
Basile, B.M., Joiner, J.A., Dal Monte, O., Fagan, N.A., Karaskiewicz,
C.L., Lucas, D.R., Chang, S.W.C., Murray, E.A., 2021. Autonomic arousal
tracks outcome salience not valence in monkeys making social decisions.
Behav. Neurosci. 135, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/bne0000424
Beatty, J., 1982. Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and
the structure of processing resources. Psychol. Bull. 91, 276–292.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276
Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y., 1995. Controlling the False Discovery Rate:
A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc.
Ser. B Methodol. 57, 289–300.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
Bertheaux, C., Toscano, R., Fortunier, R., Roux, J.-C., Charier, D.,
Borg, C., 2020. Emotion Measurements Through the Touch of Materials
Surfaces. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13.
Björnsdotter, M., Löken, L., Olausson, H., Vallbo, A., Wessberg, J.,
2009. Somatotopic organization of gentle touch processing in the
posterior insular cortex. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 29,
9314–9320. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0400-09.2009
Bytomski, A., Ritschel, G., Bierling, A., Bendas, J., Weidner, K., Croy,
I., 2020. Maternal stroking is a fine-tuned mechanism relating to
C-tactile afferent activation: An exploratory study. Psychol. Neurosci.
13, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000184
Cascio, C.J., Moore, D., McGlone, F., 2019. Social touch and human
development. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci., Social Touch: A new vista for
developmental cognitive neuroscience? 35, 5–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009
Case, L.K., Liljencrantz, J., McCall, M.V., Bradson, M., Necaise, A.,
Tubbs, J., Olausson, H., Wang, B., Bushnell, M.C., 2021. Pleasant Deep
Pressure: Expanding the Social Touch Hypothesis. Neuroscience 464,
3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.050
Chatel-Goldman, J., Congedo, M., Jutten, C., Schwartz, J.-L., 2014.
Touch increases autonomic coupling between romantic partners. Front.
Behav. Neurosci. 8, 95. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00095
Croy, I., Luong, A., Triscoli, C., Hofmann, E., Olausson, H., Sailer,
U., 2016. Interpersonal stroking touch is targeted to C tactile afferent
activation. Behav. Brain Res. SreeTestContent1 297, 37–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.09.038
Dal Monte, O., Costa, V.D., Noble, P.L., Murray, E.A., Averbeck, B.B.,
2015. Amygdala lesions in rhesus macaques decrease attention to threat.
Nat. Commun. 6, 10161.
Ellingsen, D.-M., Wessberg, J., Chelnokova, O., Olausson, H., Laeng, B.,
Leknes, S., 2014. In touch with your emotions: Oxytocin and touch change
social impressions while others’ facial expressions can alter touch.
Psychoneuroendocrinology 39, 11–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017
Field, T., 2010. Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A
review. Dev. Rev. 30, 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.01.001
Fotopoulou, A., von Mohr, M., Krahé, C., 2022. Affective regulation
through touch: homeostatic and allostatic mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Behav.
Sci. 43, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.08.008
Gallace, A., Spence, C., 2016. Social Touch, in: Olausson, H., Wessberg,
J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F. (Eds.), Affective Touch and the
Neurophysiology of CT Afferents. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 227–238.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6418-5_14
Gordon, I., Voos, A.C., Bennett, R.H., Bolling, D.Z., Pelphrey, K.A.,
Kaiser, M.D., 2013. Brain mechanisms for processing affective touch.
Hum. Brain Mapp. 34, 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21480
Grewen, K.M., Girdler, S.S., Amico, J., Light, K.C., 2005. Effects of
partner support on resting oxytocin, cortisol, norepinephrine, and blood
pressure before and after warm partner contact. Psychosom. Med. 67,
531–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000170341.88395.47
Gulledge, A., Hill, M., Lister, Z., Sallion, C., 2007. Non-Erotic
Physical Affection: It’s Good for You, in: Low-Cost Approaches to
Promote Physical and Mental Health: Theory, Research, and Practice. pp.
371–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36899-X_18
Gusso, M. de M., Serur, G., Nohama, P., 2021. Pupil Reactions to Tactile
Stimulation: A Systematic Review. Front. Neurosci. 15.
Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., Ehlert, U., 2003. Social
support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective
responses to psychosocial stress. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 1389–1398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00465-7
Henricson, M., Berglund, A.-L., Määttä, S., Ekman, R., Segesten, K.,
2008. The outcome of tactile touch on oxytocin in intensive care
patients: a randomised controlled trial. J. Clin. Nurs. 17, 2624–2633.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02324.x
Hertenstein, M.J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B.A., Jaskolka, A.R.,
2006. Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion 6, 528–533.
https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528
Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., Iwamura, Y., 1996. Attention-induced neuronal
activity in the monkey somatosensory cortex revealed by pupillometrics.
Neurosci. Res. 25, 173–181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0102(96)01043-7
Kirsch, L.P., Besharati, S., Papadaki, C., Crucianelli, L., Bertagnoli,
S., Ward, N., Moro, V., Jenkinson, P.M., Fotopoulou, A., 2020. Damage to
the right insula disrupts the perception of affective touch. eLife 9,
e47895. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47895
Laeng, B., Falkenberg, L., 2007. Women’s pupillary responses to sexually
significant others during the hormonal cycle. Horm. Behav. 52, 520–530.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.07.013
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., Gredebäck, G., 2012. Pupillometry: A Window to
the Preconscious? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. J. Assoc. Psychol. Sci. 7,
18–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611427305
Lee, J., Cichy, K., 2020. Complex Role of Touch in Social Relationships
for Older Adults’ Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Res. Aging 42,
016402752091579. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520915793
Lo, C., Chu, S.T., Penney, T.B., Schirmer, A., 2021. 3D Hand-Motion
Tracking and Bottom-Up Classification Sheds Light on the Physical
Properties of Gentle Stroking. Neuroscience, The Neurobiology of Social
and Affective Touch 464, 90–104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.09.037
Löken, L.S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., Olausson, H.,
2009. Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nat.
Neurosci. 12, 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2312
Mazza, A., Cariola, M., Capiotto, F., Diano, M., Schintu, S., Pia, L.,
Dal Monte, O., 2023a. Hedonic and autonomic responses in promoting
affective touch. Sci. Rep. 13, 11201.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37471-9
Mazza, A., Ciorli, T., Mirlisenna, I., D’Onofrio, I., Mantellino, S.,
Zaccaria, M., Pia, L., Dal Monte, O., 2023b. Pain perception and
physiological responses are modulated by active support from a romantic
partner. Psychophysiology 60, e14299. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14299
McGlone, F., Wessberg, J., Olausson, H., 2014. Discriminative and
affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron 82, 737–755.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.001
Morrison, I., 2016a. Keep Calm and Cuddle on: Social Touch as a Stress
Buffer. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 2, 344–362.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0052-x
Morrison, I., 2016b. CT Afferent-Mediated Affective Touch: Brain
Networks and Functional Hypotheses, in: Affective Touch and the
Neurophysiology of CT Afferents. pp. 195–208.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-6418-5_12
Morrison, I., Löken, L.S., Olausson, H., 2010. The skin as a social
organ. Exp. Brain Res. 204, 305–314.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2007-y
Nava, E., Etzi, R., Gallace, A., Macchi Cassia, V., 2021.
Socially-relevant Visual Stimulation Modulates Physiological Response to
Affective Touch in Human Infants. Neuroscience 464, 59–66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.07.007
Olausson, H.W., Cole, J., Vallbo, Å., McGlone, F., Elam, M., Krämer,
H.H., Rylander, K., Wessberg, J., Bushnell, M.C., 2008. Unmyelinated
tactile afferents have opposite effects on insular and somatosensory
cortical processing. Neurosci. Lett. 436, 128–132.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2008.03.015
Pagliaccio, D., Pine, D.S., Leibenluft, E., Dal Monte, O., Averbeck,
B.B., Costa, V.D., 2019. Cross-species convergence in pupillary
response: understanding human anxiety via non-human primate amygdala
lesion. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 14, 591–599.
https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsz041
Partala, T., Surakka, V., 2003. Pupil size variation as an indication of
affective processing. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., Applications of
Affective Computing in Human-Computer Interaction 59, 185–198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00017-X
Pawling, R., Cannon, P.R., McGlone, F.P., Walker, S.C., 2017. C-tactile
afferent stimulating touch carries a positive affective value. PloS One
12, e0173457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173457
Pfabigan, D.M., Frogner, E.R., Schéle, E., Thorsby, P.M., Skålhegg,
B.S., Dickson, S.L., Sailer, U., 2023. Ghrelin is related to lower brain
reward activation during touch. Psychophysiology n/a, e14443.
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14443
Pyasik, M., Fortunato, E., Dal Monte, O., Schintu, S., Garbarini, F.,
Ciorli, T., Pia, L., 2022. Self-other distinction modulates the social
softness illusion. Psychol. Res. 86, 1165–1173.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01549-8
Robinson, K.J., Hoplock, L.B., Cameron, J.J., 2015. When in Doubt, Reach
Out: Touch Is a Covert but Effective Mode of Soliciting and Providing
Social Support. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 6, 831–839.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615584197
Rudebeck, P.H., Putnam, P.T., Daniels, T.E., Yang, T., Mitz, A.R.,
Rhodes, S.E.V., Murray, E.A., 2014. A role for primate subgenual
cingulate cortex in sustaining autonomic arousal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A. 111, 5391–5396. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317695111
Sailer, U., Triscoli, C., Häggblad, G., Hamilton, P., Olausson, H.,
Croy, I., 2016. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during 40 minutes
of pleasant touch. NeuroImage 139, 360–367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.031
Schirmer, A., Croy, I., Ackerley, R., 2023. What are C-tactile afferents
and how do they relate to “affective touch”? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.
151, 105236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105236
Sehlstedt, I., Ignell, H., Backlund Wasling, H., Ackerley, R., Olausson,
H., Croy, I., 2016. Gentle touch perception across the lifespan.
Psychol. Aging 31, 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000074
Suvilehto, J.T., Glerean, E., Dunbar, R.I.M., Hari, R., Nummenmaa, L.,
2015. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between
humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 13811–13816.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519231112
Triscoli, C., Croy, I., Steudte-Schmiedgen, S., Olausson, H., Sailer,
U., 2017. Heart rate variability is enhanced by long-lasting pleasant
touch at CT-optimized velocity. Biol. Psychol. 128, 71–81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.07.007
van Hooijdonk, R., Mathot, S., Schat, E., Spencer, H., van der Stigchel,
S., Dijkerman, H.C., 2019. Touch-induced pupil size reflects stimulus
intensity, not subjective pleasantness. Exp. Brain Res. 237, 201–210.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-018-5404-2
von Mohr, M., Kirsch, L.P., Fotopoulou, A., 2017. The soothing function
of touch: affective touch reduces feelings of social exclusion. Sci.
Rep. 7, 13516. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13355-7
Wijaya, M., Lau, D., Horrocks, S., McGlone, F., Ling, H., Schirmer, A.,
2020. The human “feel” of touch contributes to its perceived
pleasantness. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 46, 155–171.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000705
Willemse, C.J.A.M., Toet, A., van Erp, J.B.F., 2017. Affective and
Behavioral Responses to Robot-Initiated Social Touch: Toward
Understanding the Opportunities and Limitations of Physical Contact in
Human–Robot Interaction. Front. ICT 4.
Wolfgang Ellermeier, Westphal, W., 1995. Gender differences in pain
ratings and pupil reactions to painful pressure stimuli. Pain 61,
435–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(94)00203-Q
Zheng, C.Y., Wang, K.-J., Wairagkar, M., Von Mohr, M., Lintunen, E.,
Fotopoulou, K., 2021. Comparing soft robotic affective touch to human
and brush affective touch, in: 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC).
Presented at the 2021 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), pp. 352–352.
https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC49131.2021.9517156