Pupil size
We found a main effect of Hand type [F(1,119) =
10.196, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.079], indicating a
stronger pupil dilation when participants received a touch from a Human
hand compared to an Artificial hand [t(119) = 3.193,p = 0.002]. Crucially, we also found a significant Hand type by
Touch type interaction [F(1,119) = 7.402, p =
0.007, η2 = 0.059], indicating that the magnitude of
increase in pupil dilation during the touch promoted by a Human hand
differed depending on the type of touch. Specifically, post-hoc t-tests
showed that only during CT-optimal touch participants exhibited a
stronger pupil dilation when receiving a touch from a Human hand
compared to an Artificial hand [t(119) =4.023;p < 0.001], indicating that pupil dilation
specifically encodes CT-optimal stimulation only when promoted by a
Human hand. Furthermore, we observed that a touch promoted by a Human
hand elicited a significant increase in pupil dilation for CT-optimal
condition compared to CT-suboptimal touch [t(119) =
2.966; p = 0.006]. During CT-suboptimal touch participants did
not show any difference between a Human and Artificial hand
[t(119) =0.213; p = 0.832]. Similarly, we did
not observe any difference in pupil dilation between CT-optimal and
CT-suboptimal conditions when the touch was promoted by an Artificial
hand [t(119) = 1.079; p = 0.283]
(Figure 2b and 2c ). Supralinearity analyses showed that 70%
(n=21) of participants displayed a supralinear effect, that is a larger
pupil size in the CT-optimal_Human condition alone than in the
CT-optimal_Artificial plus CT-suboptimal_Human conditions summed
together [t(29) = 1.781, p = 0.043]
(Figure 2d ).
Our results show a stronger pupil dilation when touch was delivered
simultaneously at CT-optimal speed and by a human hand. This kind of
touch invoked a supralinear enhancement of pupil dilation indicating
that the combination of these two features induced a significantly
stronger physiological activation than the summed effects of each
delivered separately.