REFERENCES
Bombaci, S.P., Farr, C.M., Gallo, H.T., Mangan, A.M., Stinson, L.T., Kaushik, M. and Pejchar, L., 2016. Using Twitter to communicate conservation science from a professional conference. Conservation Biology30 (1), pp.216-225.
Casola, W.R., Rushing, J., Futch, S., Vayer, V., Lawson, D.F., Cavalieri, M.J., Larson, L.R. and Peterson, M.N., 2020. How do YouTube videos impact tolerance of wolves?. Human Dimensions of Wildlife25 (6), 531-543.
Clement, J. (2019). YouTube - statistics & facts . statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/ youtube/ (accessed March 2021).
Di Minin, E., Tenkanen, H. and Toivonen, T., 2015. Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Frontiers in Environmental Science3 , p.63.
Dylewski, Ł., Mikula, P., Tryjanowski, P., Morelli, F. and Yosef, R., 2017. Social media and scientific research are complementary—YouTube and shrikes as a case study. The Science of Nature104 (5-6), p.48.
Google (2020a). How Video Views Are Counted. Available online at: https://support. google.com/youtube/answer/2991785 (accessed March 2021).
Google (2020b). The Latest YouTube Stats on Audience Demographics: Who’s Tuning In. Available online at: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/data- collections/youtube- viewer- behavior- online- video- audience/ (accessed March 2021).
Hines, H.N., 2019. Cell-fies: sharing microbiology with global audiences through Instagram. FEMS Microbiology Letters366 (16), p.fnz205.
Hines, H.N., and Warring, S., 2019. How we use Instagram to communicate microbiology to the public. Nature . https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00493-3.
Huang, T. and Grant, W.J., 2020. A good story well told: storytelling components that impact science video popularity on YouTube. Frontiers in Communication5 , p.86.
Jagiello, Z.A., Dyderski, M.K. and Dylewski, Ł., 2019. What can we learn about the behaviour of red and grey squirrels from YouTube?. Ecological informatics51 , pp.52-60.
Kidd, L.R., Gregg, E.A., Bekessy, S.A., Robinson, J.A. and Garrard, G.E., 2018. Tweeting for their lives: Visibility of threatened species on twitter. Journal for Nature Conservation46 , pp.106-109.
Kusmanoff, A.M., Fidler, F., Gordon, A., Garrard, G.E. and Bekessy, S.A., 2020. Five lessons to guide more effective biodiversity conservation message framing. Conservation Biology34 (5), pp.1131-1141.
Llewellyn, T. and Rose, P.E., 2021. Education Is Entertainment? Zoo Science Communication on YouTube. Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens2 (2), pp.250-264.
Morcillo, J.M., Czurda, K. and Robertson-von Trotha, C.Y., 2016. Typologies of the popular science web video. JCOM15 (04), pp.A02-2. Many factors are present in a science video when making a successful YouTube effort (Morcillo et al. 2016).
Otsuka, R. and Yamakoshi, G., 2020. Analyzing the popularity of YouTube videos that violate mountain gorilla tourism regulations. PloS one15 (5), p.e0232085.
Schmidt, J.O., Blum, M.S. and Overal, W.L., 1983. Hemolytic activities of stinging insect venoms. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology1 (2), pp.155-160.
Schmidt, J.O., 2020. Everybody Loves Stinging Insects!. American Entomologist66 (2), pp.28-29.
Toivonen, T., Heikinheimo, V., Fink, C., Hausmann, A., Hiippala, T., Järv, O., Tenkanen, H. and Di Minin, E., 2019. Social media data for conservation science: A methodological overview. Biological Conservation233 , pp.298-315.
Welbourne, D.J. and Grant, W.J., 2016. Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public understanding of science25 (6), pp.706-718. doi: 10.1177/0963662515572068.
Wu, Y., Xie, L., Huang, S.L., Li, P., Yuan, Z. and Liu, W., 2018. Using social media to strengthen public awareness of wildlife conservation. Ocean & Coastal Management153 , pp.76-83.
YouTube., 2021a. YouTube for Press . Available online at: https://www.youtube. com/intl/en-GB/yt/about/press/ (accessed March 2021).
YouTube., 2021b. BraveWilderness. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/c/BraveWilderness/about (accessed 15 May January 2021).