Background: Polyomavirus BK virus infection is a significant complication of renal transplantation and is an important cause of allograft loss. Today, despite the innovations in the pharmaceutical industry, a curative treatment against the BK virus has not been developed. The management is not standardized and is generally based on reported experience from transplantation centers. However, the literature on the subject with large samples is limited. Therefore, we designed a study to present our countrywide experience with BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) in renal transplant recipients. Methods: Our study was conducted with thirty kidney transplant centers from all provinces of Turkey. Only cases with BKVN proven by allograft biopsy were included in our study. Demographic characteristics and laboratory values of the patients were obtained from the archives and electronic databases of the centers. Results: A total of 13.857 patients from 30 transplantation centers were screened. 207 BKVN cases proven by allograft biopsy were identified and included in the study. The mean age was 46.4±13.1, and 146 (70.5%) patients were male. Twenty-six patients did not receive any induction therapy, 144 patients received anti-T lymphocyte globulin (ATLG), and 37 patients received basiliximab after transplantation. 23.6% of the patients had acute rejection history in the first six months of renal transplantation. all were treated with pulse steroids, and 46 were also treated with ATLG. The mean time to diagnosis of BKVN was 15.8±22.2 months after transplantation. At the time of diagnosis, the patients’ mean creatinine level was 1.8±0.7 mg/dl, and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 45.8±19.6 ml/min. While BKVN was solely reported in 181 cases, there were cellular rejection findings in 21 biopsy specimens and humoral rejection in 4 biopsy specimens. In addition of dose reduction or discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs, eighteen patients were treated with cidofovir, 11 patients with leflunomide, 17 patients with quinolones, 15 patients with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), five patients with cidofovir+IVIG, and 12 patients with leflunomide+IVIG. None of the patients who received leflunomide and leflunomide+IVIG had allograft loss. Allograft loss was observed in 12 (15%) of 78 patients treated with antivirals or immunomodulators. Allograft loss occurred in 32 patients (15%) during follow-up out of 207 patients with BKVN. Five patients were retransplanted, and none developed BKVN during the follow-up. Conclusions: BKVN is still a significant cause of allograft loss in kidney transplantation, which has not been fully elucidated. Leflunomide appears to be an effective treatment in these patients.

Objective: No effective treatment has yet been found for SARS-cov-2, which caused a pandemic outbreak in 2019. It is crucial to detect the progression of Covid-19 in patients as early as possible. Fibrinogen to albumin ratio (FAR) has been used as a new inflammatory marker. We aimed to find out whether the use of the FAR ratio as a predictor of mortality in Covid-19 patients provides clinical benefit. Materials and Methods: Data from 590 patients with Covid-19 from 15/03/2020 to 15/01/2021 in medicine wards and intensive care units (ICU) were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data and other laboratory markers were collected from the electronic medical records. Relationship between FAR ratio was investigated between patients in the survivor/non-survivor patients. Findings: The mean FAR levels in patients who were non survivor was 24.44±30.3 (n:272 and 11.29±6.29 (n:275) (p:0.000) in patients survivor COVID-19 infection. In ROC curve for FAR, the threshold FAR that may pose a risk for mortality was determined as 13.84 ((AUC: 0.808(0.771-0.844)); 74.9% Sensitivity, 74.6% Specificity; p:0.000 )). Result: As a result of this study, increased FAR were found to be important markers in determining the mortality levels in Covid-19 patients. What is already known about FAR ratio: The fibrinogen albumin ratio is a value that has been used to determine the prognosis, especially in malignancies. [32] In a recent study 91 Covid-19 patients were analyzed 22 patients with severe disease higher FAR ratio compare to mild disaese [36] What does this article add about FAR ratio in Covid-19 patients: It has been concluded that the FAR ratio, which is used in diseases such as malignancy, hypertension, and coronary syndrome as a marker of disease progression, can be used as a mortality indicator in Covid-19

Aim: The aim of this study was to measure plasma midkine levels in patients with COVID-19 and to assess its clinical significance. Material and Method: 88 patients followed in our hospital with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, clinical and laboratory data of the patients were recorded, and the relationship between midkine level and prognosis and other parameters were investigated. Results: Of the 88 patients included in the study, 43 (48.9%) were female and 45 (51.1%) were male. 24 (27%) of our cases were died. The mean age of non-survivals was 70 ± 12.3 and the survivals were 61.9 ± 18.2 years. Mortality predictors due to COVID-19 in group 2 patients were significantly higher than those in group 2 (p <0.05). The median (IR) value of the MK level was 152.5±125 pg/ml in all patients, 143±149 pg/ml in survivors and 165.5±76 pg/ml in those who died (p= 0.546). The difference between these two groups compared according to mortality was not statistically significant The area under the ROC curve was found to be 0.542 (95% CI 0.423-0.661, p= 0.546). Conclusion: MK is not a biomarker that can reinforce known predictors of mortality in COVID-19 patients and can provide better predictions of mortality.